Particle physics art

Art illuminates the beauty of science – and could insp …


[ad_1]

Like a neuroscience and bioscience researcher, I know scientists are sometimes cataloged as white coats obsessed with charts and graphs. What this stereotype lacks is their passion for science as a mode of discovery. This is why scientists frequently look to impressive visualizations as a way to explain the inexplicable.

the BioArt Scientific Image and Video Competition, administered by the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology, shares images rarely seen outside the lab with the public to introduce and educate laypersons about the wonders often associated with biological research. BioArt and similar competitions reflect the long history of using imagery to elucidate science.

A historical and intellectual moment

the Renaissance, a period in European history between the 14th and 17th centuries, breathed new life into science and art. He brought together the emerging discipline of natural History – a field of investigation observing animals, plants and fungi in their ordinary environment – with artistic illustration. This allowed for a broader study and classification of the natural world.

Winner of the BioArt 2020 competition, this image shows HeLa cells infected with the common but deadly foodborne pathogen Listeria monocytogenes. Arandeep Dhanda / BioArt, CC BY-NC-ND

Artists and artistic naturalists have also been able to advance approaches to the study of nature by illustrating the findings of early botanists and anatomists. Flemish artist Peter Paul Rubens, for example, offered remarkable insight into human anatomy in his famous anatomical drawings.

This art-science formula was further democratized in the 17th and 18th centuries as a the printing process has become more sophisticated and enabled early ornithologists and anatomists to publish and distribute their elegant designs. Early popular entries included “John James Audubon”Birds of america“And Charles Darwin”The origin of the species”- revolutionary at the time for the clarity of their illustrations.

Art played a role in the advancement of the natural sciences during the Renaissance, such as the human anatomical studies of Rubens. Peter Paul Rubens / The Metropolitan Museum of Art via Wikimedia Commons

The editors quickly followed with well-received field guides and encyclopedias detailing observations of what was seen early on. microscopes. For example, a Scottish encyclopedia published in 1859, “Chambers’s Encyclopedia: A Dictionary of Universal Knowledge for the People, sought to largely explain the natural world through block of wood illustrations of mammals, microorganisms, birds and reptiles.

These posts responded to the public’s demand for more news and perspectives on the natural world. People formed societies of amateur naturalists, hunted fossils, and enjoyed trips to local zoos or menageries. In the nineteenth century, natural history museums were built around the world to share scientific knowledge through illustrations, models and real-life examples. Objects on display ranged from taxidermized animals to human organs preserved in liquid.

What started out as hand drawings has transformed over the past 150 years with the help of new technologies. The advent of sophisticated imaging techniques such as X-rays in 1895, electron microscopes in 1931, 3D modeling in the 1960s and magnetic resonance imaging or MRI in 1973 made it easier for scientists to share what they saw in the lab. In fact, Wilhelm Roentgen, a physics professor who first discovered x-rays, made the first human x-ray image with his wife’s hand.

Today, scientific publications, including Nature and The scientist have made a habit of sharing their favorites with readers. Visualizations, whether through photography or video, are yet another method for scientists to document, test and affirm their research.

The first x-ray image was the hand of the wife of x-ray discoverer Wilhelm Roentgen. Wilhelm Conrad Röntgen / Brockhaus Multimedia via Wikimedia Commons

Science, art and education K-12

These science visualizations have found their way into classrooms as K-12 schools add science photographs and videos to lesson plans.

Art museums, for example, have developed art-based science programs to give students an overview of what science looks like. It can help promote scientific culture, increasing both their understanding of basic scientific principles and their critical thinking skills.

Science culture is particularly important now. During a pandemic in which misinformation about COVID-19 and vaccines has spread, a better understanding of natural phenomena could help students learn to make informed decisions about disease risk and its transmission . Teaching science literacy equips students with the skills to assess complaints scientists and public figures, whether it’s COVID-19, the common cold or climate change.

However, scientific knowledge seems to be stagnating. the National Assessment of Educational Progress 2019 measures the scientific knowledge and scientific inquiry skills of U.S. public school students in grades 4, 8, and 12 on a scale of zero to 300. Scores have stagnated for all years from 2009 to 2019, hovering between 150 and 154 .

A survey of K-12 teachers shows that 77% of elementary school teachers spend less than four hours a week on science. And the 2018 National Science and Mathematics Education Survey found that Kindergarten to Grade 3 students on average only receive 18 minutes of science teaching per day, compared to 57 minutes in math.

Making science more visual can make learn science from an early age Easier. It could also help students understand scientific models and develop skills such as teamwork and communicating complex concepts.

Deepening scientific knowledge

the BioArt Scientific Image and Video Competition was created 10 years ago to both give scientists an outlet to share their latest research and to allow a wider audience to see biosciences from a researcher’s perspective.

Winner of the 2018 BioArt competition, this image shows the intestinal villi of a mouse. Amy Engevik / BioArt, CC BY-NC-ND

What is unique about the BioArt competition is the diversity of submissions over the past decade. After all, the biosciences encompass the wide range of disciplines within the life sciences. The winners of the BioArt 2021 competition range from developing eye of zebrafish embryo to the shell of a kind of 96-million-year-old Helochelydrid fossil turtle.

I have been a judge for the BioArt competition for the past five years. My appreciation for the science behind the images is often overwhelmed by my enjoyment for their beauty and technical competence. For example, photography using polarized light, which filters light waves to oscillate in one direction instead of multiple directions, allows scientists to reveal what the interiors of otherwise hidden samples look like.

Whether today or in the past, science is elucidating the foundations of our world, both in miniature and on a large scale. I hope that visual lighting of scientific concepts and processes can advance science literacy and give students and the general public access to a deeper understanding of the natural world that they need to be informed citizens. That these images and videos often look good is an added bonus. DM / ML

This story was first published in The conversation.

Chris Curran is Professor and Program Director of Neuroscience at Northern Kentucky University.

Gallery

[ad_2]